MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313491955 · doi:10.7202/1092767ar

Politique d’une esthétique de la folie dans À la folie de Joy Sorman

2022· article· fr· W4313491955 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Solène Camus, Jehanne Eveno, Caroline Hildebrandt

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes littéraires · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEvelyn Waugh and Hans Urs von Balthasar Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parti du constat de l’hybridité générique du projet littéraire de Joy Sorman dans À la Folie , cet article se propose de définir les étapes de la poétique de l’autrice qui prend sa source dans la multiplicité des textes théoriques ayant trait à la folie. L’autrice s’appuie sur les travaux de Foucault, Deleuze et Goffman, dans l’optique d’une saisie totale de l’expérience de la folie. L’article en arrive à analyser le syncrétisme du roman comme projet politique : la forme hybride redevient un tremplin vers une pensée politique qui tend vers une égalité des discours sans en atténuer la conflictualité.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.848
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes littérairesSame topicEvelyn Waugh and Hans Urs von Balthasar StudiesFrench-language works237,207