3-D Data Interpolation and Denoising by an Adaptive Weighting Rank-Reduction Method Using Multichannel Singular Spectrum Analysis Algorithm
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Addressing insufficient and irregular sampling is a difficult challenge in seismic processing and imaging. Recently, rank reduction methods have become popular in seismic processing algorithms for simultaneous denoising and interpolating. These methods are based on rank reduction of the trajectory matrices using truncated singular value decomposition (TSVD). Estimation of the ranks of these trajectory matrices depends on the number of plane waves in the processing window; however, for the more complicated data, the rank reduction method may fail or give poor results. In this paper, we propose an adaptive weighted rank reduction (AWRR) method that selects the optimum rank in each window automatically. The method finds the maximum ratio of the energy between two singular values. The AWRR method selects a large rank for the highly curved complex events, which leads to remaining residual errors. To overcome the residual errors, a weighting operator on the selected singular values minimizes the effect of noise projection on the signal projection. We tested the efficiency of the proposed method by applying it to both synthetic and real seismic data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it