MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4313511855 · doi:10.5194/acp-2022-829

Spatio-temporal variation characteristics of global wildfires and their emissions

2023· preprint· en· W4313511855 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hao Fan, Xingchuan Yang, Chuanfeng Zhao, Yikun Yang, Zhenyao Shen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceContext (archaeology)Climate changeLatitudeClimatologyPhysical geographySpatial distributionAtmospheric sciencesTerrestrial ecosystemGeographyEcosystemRemote sensingEcologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Intense regional wildfires are a common occurrence in the context of climate warming and have progressively evolved into one of the major natural disasters in terrestrial ecosystems, posing a serious hazard to the atmosphere and climate change. We investigated the spatial distribution, intensity, emission changes, and meteorological differences of wildfires in different wildfire active and wildfire-prone regions globally based on multi-source satellite remote sensing fire data, emission data, and meteorological data in order to better understand the change trend of wildfire activity at multiple spatial and temporal scales. The findings demonstrate that while the wildfire burned area (BA) has decreased slowly over the last 20 years, the wildfire burned fraction (BF), the fire count (FC), and the fire radiative power (FRP) all exhibit pronounced regional and seasonal variations. The physical characteristics of wildfires, including the BF, FC and FRP, experience greater seasonal variation as latitude increases, with summer and autumn as the reasons with the most frequent wildfires worldwide. This study also shows that the emission declined substantially between 2012 and 2020 in Northern Canada, Alaska, and Northeast China, whereas it notably increased in the Siberia region during the same period, primarily due to a rise in summer emissions. The results based on classification show that the absolute amount of CO2 produced by wildfires is the largest, and the difference among regions is relatively small. Excluding CO2, aerosol emissions (the total of OC, TC, and BC) ranged from 78.6 % to 84.2 %, while the least significant air pollutants (the total of PM2.5, SO2, and NOx) ranged from 5.8 % to 11.7 %. The abundance of vegetation predominately affects the intensity change of wildfire development, while the weather conditions can also indirectly influence the incidence of wildfire by altering the growth condition of vegetation. Correspondingly, the increase in temperature in the northern hemisphere's middle and high latitude forest regions was primarily responsible for the increase in wildfires and emissions, while the change in wildfires in tropical regions was more influenced by the decrease in precipitation and relative humidity. This study contributes to the understanding of regional variations in wildfire activity and emission variability, and provides support for the control of wildfire activity across regions and seasons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFire effects on ecosystems→French-language works237,207→