MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313518368 · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aca281

X-Ray Polarization Observations of BL Lacertae

2022· article· en· W4313518368 on OpenAlexaff
R. Middei, Ioannis Liodakis, M. Perri, Simonetta Puccetti, E. Cavazzuti, Laura Di Gesu, Steven R. Ehlert, G. Madejski, Alan P. Marscher, Herman L. Marshall, Fabio Muleri, Michela Negro, Svetlana G. Jorstad, Beatriz Agı́s-González, I. Agudo, G. Bonnoli, M. Bernardos, V. Casanova, Maya Garcı́a-Comas, C. Husillos, Alessandro Marchini, A. Sota, Pouya M. Kouch, E. Lindfors, Г. А. Борман, E. N. Kopatskaya, Е. Г. Ларионова, D. A. Morozova, С. С. Савченко, A. A. Vasilyev, А. В. Жовтан, C. Casadio, Juan Escudero, I. Myserlis, Antonio Hales, Seiji Kameno, R. Kneißl, Hugo Messias, Hiroshi Nagai, Ioakeim G. Bourbah, S. Kiehlmann, Evangelos Kontopodis, N. Mandarakas, Stylianos Romanopoulos, Raphael Skalidis, Anna Vervelaki, J. Masiero, Dimitri Mawet, Maxwell A. Millar‐Blanchaer, G. V. Panopoulou, Samaporn Tinyanont, A. Berdyugin, Masato Kagitani, Vadim Kravtsov, Takeshi Sakanoi, Ryo Imazawa, Mahito Sasada, Y. Fukazawa, Koji S. Kawabata, Makoto Uemura, Tsunefumi Mizuno, Tatsuya Nakaoka, Hiroshi Akitaya, Mark Gurwell, Ramprasad Rao, Niccolò Di Lalla, Nicolò Cibrario, I. Donnarumma, Dawoon E. Kim, N. Omodei, L. Pacciani, Juri Poutanen, F. Tavecchio, L. A. Antonelli, Matteo Bachetti, L. Baldini, W. H. Baumgartner, R. Bellazzini, S. Bianchi, Stephen D. Bongiorno, R. Bonino, A. Brez, N. Bucciantini, Fiamma Capitanio, Simone Castellano, S. Ciprini, E. Costa, Alessandra De Rosa, E. Del Monte, Alessandro Di Marco, Victor Doroshenko, Michal Dovčiak, Teruaki Enoto, Y. Evangelista, Sergio Fabiani, Riccardo Ferrazzoli, Javier A. García, Shuichi Gunji, Kiyoshi Hayashida, Jeremy Heyl, W. Iwakiri, V. Karas, Takao Kitaguchi, Jeffery J. Kolodziejczak, H. Krawczynski, Fabio La Monaca, L. Latronico, S. Maldera, Alberto Manfreda, Frédéric Marin, Andrea Marinucci, F. Massaro, G. Matt, Ikuyuki Mitsuishi, C.‐Y. Ng, Stephen L. O’Dell, C. Oppedisano, Alessandro Papitto, George G. Pavlov, Abel L. Peirson, M. Pesce-Rollins, Pierre-Olivier Petrucci, M. Pilia, Andrea Possenti, Brian D. Ramsey, John Rankin, Ajay Ratheesh, Roger W. Romani, C. Sgró, Patrick Slane, G. Spandre, Toru Tamagawa, Roberto Taverna, Yuzuru Tawara, Allyn F. Tennant, Nicholas E. Thomas, Francesco Tombesi, A. Trois, Sergey S. Tsygankov, Jacco Vink, Martin C. Weisskopf, Kinwah Wu, Fei Xie, Silvia Zane

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal Letters · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersConsejo Superior de Investigaciones CientíficasJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceTurun YliopistoCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyLeibniz-GemeinschaftCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesAcademia SinicaSmithsonian InstitutionInstituto de Astrofísica de AndalucíaJunta de AndalucíaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPolarization (electrochemistry)AstrophysicsPhysicsX-rayAstronomyOpticsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Blazars are a class of jet-dominated active galactic nuclei with a typical double-humped spectral energy distribution. It is of common consensus that the synchrotron emission is responsible for the low frequency peak, while the origin of the high frequency hump is still debated. The analysis of X-rays and their polarization can provide a valuable tool to understand the physical mechanisms responsible for the origin of high-energy emission of blazars. We report the first observations of BL Lacertae (BL Lac) performed with the Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer, from which an upper limit to the polarization degree Π X < 12.6% was found in the 2–8 keV band. We contemporaneously measured the polarization in radio, infrared, and optical wavelengths. Our multiwavelength polarization analysis disfavors a significant contribution of proton-synchrotron radiation to the X-ray emission at these epochs. Instead, it supports a leptonic origin for the X-ray emission in BL Lac.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score0.486

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal LettersSame topicAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207