MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313518939 · doi:10.3390/s23010504

Improving Concrete Crack Segmentation Networks through CutMix Data Synthesis and Temporal Data Fusion

2023· article· en· W4313518939 on OpenAlexafffund
Maziar Jamshidi, Mamdouh El‐Badry, Navid Nourian

Bibliographic record

VenueSensors · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSegmentationComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceConvolutional neural networkArtificial neural networkPattern recognition (psychology)Transfer of learningPixelKey (lock)Deep learningData miningComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A key element in an automated visual inspection system for concrete structures is identifying the geometric properties of surface defects such as cracks. Fully convolutional neural networks (FCNs) have been demonstrated to be powerful tools for crack segmentation in inspection images. However, the performance of FCNs depends on the size of the dataset that they are trained with. In the absence of large datasets of labeled images for concrete crack segmentation, these networks may lose their excellent prediction accuracy when tested on a new target dataset with different image conditions. In this study, firstly, a Transfer Learning approach is developed to enable the networks better distinguish cracks from background pixels. A synthetic dataset is generated and utilized to fine-tune a U-Net that is pre-trained with a public dataset. In the proposed data synthesis approach, which is based on CutMix data augmentation, the crack images from the public dataset are combined with the background images of a potential target dataset. Secondly, since cracks propagate over time, for sequential images of concrete surfaces, a novel temporal data fusion technique is proposed. In this technique, the network's predictions from multiple time steps are aggregated to improve the recall of predictions. It is shown that application of the proposed improvements has increased the F1-score and mIoU by 28.4% and 22.2%, respectively, which is a significant enhancement in performance of the segmentation network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.761
Threshold uncertainty score0.542

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensorsSame topicInfrastructure Maintenance and MonitoringFrench-language works237,207