Health Informatics on Big COVID-19 Pandemic Data via N-Shot Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nowadays, very large amounts of data are generating at a fast rate from a wide variety of rich data sources. Valuable information and knowledge embedded in these big data can be discovered by data science, data mining and machine learning techniques. Biomedical records are examples of the big data. With the technological advancements, more healthcare practice has gradually been supported by electronic processes and communication. This enables health informatics, in which computer science meets the healthcare sector to address healthcare and medical problems. As a concrete example, there have been more than 635 millions cumulative cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) worldwide over the past 3 years since COVID-19 has declared as a pandemic. Hence, effective strategies, solutions, tools and methods—such as artificial intelligence (AI) and/or big data approaches—to tackle the COVID-19 pandemic and possible future pandemics are in demand. In this paper, we present models to analyze big COVID-19 pandemic data and make predictions via N-shot learning. Specifically, our binary model predicts whether patients are COVID-19 or not. If so, the model predicts whether they require hospitalization or not, whereas our multi-class model predicts severity and thus the corresponding levels of hospitalization required by the patients. Our models uses N-shot learning with autoencoders. Evaluation results on real-life pandemic data demonstrate the practicality of our models towards effective allocation of resources (e.g., hospital facilities, staff). These showcase the benefits of AI and/or big data approaches in tackling the pandemic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".