Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Optical instruments were proposed to assess the nitrogen (N) concentration of the leaves of wild lowbush blueberries (Vaccinium angustifolium Ait.). The objectives were to assess the effects of NPK fertilizer rates on leaf N concentrations and optical measurement values and to examine the relationship between leaf N concentration and optical measurements. Four rates of ammonium sulfate (0 to 90 kg N ha−1), two rates of P (0 and 20 kg P2O5 ha−1) and four rates of K (0 to 90 kg K2O ha−1) were applied in the spring of the sprout year. Leaf sampling and optical measurements were conducted four times during the sprout year. Optical measurements were made with a SPAD-502 meter (Minolta) and a Dualex3 meter (Force-A). Leaf N concentrations decreased during the growing season while SPAD and Dualex3 values increased, although SPAD values dropped at the end of the season. N rates increased leaf N concentrations and SPAD values on all sampling dates while decreasing Dualex3 values. The best estimate of leaf N concentration was obtained with SPAD measurements and with the SPAD/Dualex3 ratio carried out at the end of July (r2 > 0.73). However, as optical measurements depend on the sites, reference plots are needed to standardize the values.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it