Strain data augmentation enables machine learning of inorganic crystal geometry optimization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Machine-learning (ML) models offer the potential to rapidly evaluate the vast inorganic crystalline materials space to efficiently find materials with properties that meet the challenges of our time. Current ML models require optimized equilibrium structures to attain accurate predictions of formation energies. However, equilibrium structures are generally not known for new materials and must be obtained through computationally expensive optimization, bottlenecking ML-based material screening. A computationally efficient structure optimizer is therefore highly desirable. In this work, we present an ML model capable of predicting the crystal energy response to global strain by using available elasticity data to augment the dataset. The addition of global strains improves our model's understanding of local strains too, significantly improving the accuracy of energy predictions on distorted structures. This allows us to construct an ML-based geometry optimizer, which we used for improving the predictions of formation energy for structures with perturbed atomic positions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it