Uncovering the Mechanism of Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescence in Coplanar Emitters Using Potential Energy Surface Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Planarized emitters exhibiting thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) have attracted attention due to their narrow emission spectra, improved photostability, and high quantum yields, but with large singlet–triplet energy gaps (Δ E ST ) and no heavy atoms, the origin of their TADF remains a subject of debate. Here we prepare two isomeric, coplanar donor–acceptor compounds, with HMAT-2PYM performing dual TADF and room-temperature phosphorescence but with HMAT-4PYM exhibiting only prompt fluorescence. Although conventional TADF design principles suggest that neither isomer should exhibit TADF, we reveal differences in the excited state potential energy surfaces that enable spin-flip processes in only one isomer. We also find that hydrogen bonding is absent between the planar units of these emitters, despite earlier claims of intramolecular hydrogen bonding in similar compounds. Overall, this work demonstrates that potential energy surface analysis is a practical strategy for designing coplanar TADF materials that might otherwise be overlooked by conventional TADF design metrics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".