MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313542978 · doi:10.1016/j.ijmst.2022.10.006

Drill bit wear monitoring and failure prediction for mining automation

2023· article· en· W4313542978 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Mining Science and Technology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMineral Processing and Grinding
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsArtificial neural networkEngineeringBit (key)BackpropagationDrill bitTool wearTime domainSupport vector machineWaveletComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)DrillingMachiningComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article introduces a novel approach for tricone bit wear condition monitoring and failure prediction for surface mining applications. A successful bit health monitoring system is essential to achieve fully autonomous blasthole drilling. In this research in-situ vibration signals were analyzed in time-frequency domain and signals trend during tricone bit life span were investigated and introduced to support the development of artificial intelligence (AI) models. In addition to the signal statistical features, wavelet packet energy distribution proved to be a powerful indicator for bit wear assessment. Backpropagation artificial neural network (ANN) models were designed, trained and evaluated for bit state classification. Finally, an ANN architecture and feature vector were introduced to classify the bit condition and predict the bit failure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.846
Threshold uncertainty score0.200

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it