MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4313545378 · doi:10.1128/jvi.01536-22

Utility of Human<i>In Vitro</i>Data in Risk Assessments of Influenza A Virus Using the Ferret Model

2023· article· en· W4313545378 on OpenAlexafffund
Hannah M. Creager, Troy J. Kieran, Hui Zeng, Xiangjie Sun, Joanna A. Pulit-Penaloza, Katie E. Holmes, A. Johnson, Terrence M. Tumpey, Taronna R. Maines, Catherine A. A. Beauchemin, Jessica A. Belser

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Virology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfluenza Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersAgency for Toxic Substances and Disease RegistryRIKENNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCenters for Disease Control and PreventionMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyOak Ridge Institute for Science and EducationDivision of Mathematical SciencesGovernment of CanadaU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsBiologyVirologyTiterVirusIn vivoIn vitroInfluenza A virusPandemicOrthomyxoviridaeHuman influenzaCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Infectious disease (medical specialty)DiseasePathologyBiotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bothin vitroandin vivomodels are employed for assessing the pandemic potential of novel and emerging influenza A viruses in laboratory settings, but systematic examinations of how well viral titer measurements obtainedin vitroalign with results fromin vivoexperimentation are not frequently performed. We show that certain viral titer measurements following infection of a human bronchial epithelial cell line are positively correlated with viral titers in specimens collected from virus-inoculated ferrets and employ mathematical modeling to identify commonalities between viral infection progression between both models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.377
GPT teacher head0.531
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Virology→Same topicInfluenza Virus Research Studies→French-language works237,207→