MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313546603 · doi:10.1109/jstars.2022.3229460

LRAD-Net: An Improved Lightweight Network for Building Extraction From Remote Sensing Images

2022· article· en· W4313546603 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Guangdong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceRobustness (evolution)Feature extractionSegmentationArtificial intelligenceDecoding methodsPattern recognition (psychology)Block (permutation group theory)Pyramid (geometry)Aerial imagePoolingImage segmentationData miningRemote sensingComputer visionImage (mathematics)Algorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The building extraction method of remote sensing images that uses deep learning algorithms can solve the problems of low efficiency and poor effect of traditional methods during feature extraction. Although some semantic segmentation networks proposed recently can achieve good segmentation performance in extracting buildings, their huge parameters and large amount of calculation lead to great obstacles in practical application. Therefore, we propose a lightweight network (named LRAD-Net) for building extraction from remote sensing images. LRAD-Net can be divided into two stages: encoding and decoding. In the encoding stage, the lightweight RegNet network with 600 million flop (600 MF) is finally selected as our feature extraction backbone net though lots of experimental comparisons. Then, a multiscale depthwise separable atrous spatial pyramid pooling structure is proposed to extract more comprehensive and important details of buildings. In the decoding stage, the squeeze-and-excitation attention mechanism is applied innovatively to redistribute the channel weights before fusing feature maps with low-level details and high-level semantics, thus can enrich the local and global information of the buildings. What's more, a lightweight residual block with polarized self-attention is proposed, it can incorporate features extracted from the space of maps and different channels with a small number of parameters, and improve the accuracy of recovering building boundary. In order to verify the effectiveness and robustness of proposed LRAD-Net, we conduct experiments on a self-annotated UAV dataset with higher resolution and three public datasets (the WHU aerial image dataset, the WHU satellite image dataset and the Inria aerial image dataset). Compared with several representative networks, LRAD-Net can extract more details of building, and has smaller number of parameters, faster computing speed, stronger generalization ability, which can improve the training speed of the network without affecting the building extraction effect and accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score0.856

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it