A Novel Hybrid Approach Based on Analytical and Metaheuristic Algorithms for Parameters and Dynamic Resistance Estimation of a PV Array
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate parameters of photovoltaic (PV) arrays are essential for the modeling, analysis, and control of PV systems. Due to the lack of complete datasheets from manufacturers, different techniques have been introduced to extract the unknown parameters of PV modules. A novel approach based on one of the most recent metaheuristic (MH) optimization algorithms, the Flow Direction Algorithm, is developed in this paper to estimate the PV-modules parameters accurately. The proposed approach extracts the parameters for single-, double-, and three-diode models under different operating conditions. Comparative studies with state-of-the-art MH algorithms showed that the proposed approach is more accurate and robust and reduces the computational burden. Furthermore, a general formula is derived to obtain the dynamic resistance of different PV models. It is shown in this paper that inaccurate PV model parameters might negatively impact the steady-state and dynamic performance assessment of grid-connected PV systems under different operating conditions. Detailed time-domain simulations are presented to validate the analytical results and show the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".