MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4313549543 · doi:10.24124/2022/59339

Myelin gene expression across murine post-natal brain development: Validating reliable QPCR methods

2022· dissertation· en· W4313549543 on OpenAlexaff
Samantha Smith

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicroRNA in disease regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOligodendrocyteRemyelinationBiologyMyelinGene expressionProgenitor cellNeural stem cellGene expression profilingNeuroscienceCell biologyGeneCentral nervous systemStem cellGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Myelination is essential for proper conduction across all neural networks. Myelination in the central nervous system is performed by glial cells called oligodendrocytes. Mature, myelinating glia develop from progenitor cells through distinct differentiation steps, and gene expression markers have been established that are unique to oligodendrocyte lineage cells. This study aims to establish a reliable RT-qPCR protocol to quantify oligodendrocyte-specific gene expression according to the MIQE guidelines. Primers specific to the progenitor, immature, and myelinating stages of oligodendrocyte differentiation were validated, showing 90-100% efficiency. Reference gene primers were also validated, and their stability was determined to make recommendations for those to use as normalization factors. The expression pattern of oligodendrocyte-specific genes across stages of postnatal development was similar to previously defined RNA-seq profiles in isolated cell types. The validated RT-qPCR assays developed build a framework for future investigation on myelination during development and remyelination in disease.,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicroRNA in disease regulation→French-language works237,207→