MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Selective Harmonic Elimination in Cascade H-bridge Multilevel Voltage Source Inverters Using A Hybrid Optimization Algorithm

2022· article· en· W4313549708 on OpenAlexaff
Hamed Madani, Hamidreza Mosaddegh Hesar, Xiaodong Liang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPulse-width modulationHarmonicsVoltageInverterSimulated annealingCascadeControl theory (sociology)WaveformComputer scienceH bridgeHarmonicHarmonic analysisAlgorithmElectronic engineeringEngineeringPhysicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To eliminate harmonics from output voltage waveforms of a multilevel voltage source inverter, the pulse width modulation (PWM) technique for selective harmonic elimination (SHE) can be performed at a low switching frequency, which reduces switching losses and increases the energy conversion efficiency in medium voltage and high power applications. The SHE strategy provides the optimal output voltage by maintaining the desired fundamental voltage component while eliminating lower order harmonics. This paper presents a hybrid optimization method based on the combination of the genetic algorithm (GA) and the simulated annealing (SA) to achieve a faster and more accurate optimal solution for the harmonic elimination problem. The advantages of the proposed hybrid algorithm compared to some other optimization methods include the speed that reaches the global minimum and the acceptable convergence rate considered in the performance analysis of the inverter. Simulation results show the superiority of the proposed hybrid algorithm by comparing with either GA or SA alone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207