MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hybrid CPU-GPU-Based Electromagnetic Transient Simulation of Modular Multilevel Converter for HVDC Application

2022· article· en· W4313562534 on OpenAlexaff
Walid Hatahet, Liwei Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceModular designConvertersTransient (computer programming)Graphics processing unitSupercomputerCentral processing unitPower system simulationTransmission systemPower (physics)Transmission (telecommunications)Electronic engineeringElectric power systemParallel computingComputer hardwareVoltageElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modular multilevel converter (MMC) is one of the key components for modern high voltage DC (HVDC) transmission systems. Fast and accurate electromagnetic transient (EMT) simulation of the MMC is crucial to capture the finest dynamics and transients required for proper planning, design, and control prototyping of multiterminal DC (MTDC) grids. This paper proposes a hybrid high-performance computing platform for the simulation of the HVDC transmission system based on graphics processing unit (GPU). An EMT program is developed to implement the discrete time model for the two-terminal modular multilevel converters. The high computational power of the hybrid CPU-GPU platform is utilized to simulate all components in the HVDC system by capturing the detailed dynamics and transients. Moreover, a parallel GPU-based simulation algorithm is presented in the paper. The proposed algorithm provides an advanced solution for balanced distribution of simulation tasks on both the CPU and GPU to exploit the available resources on GPU at low communication latency without any compromise of the simulation accuracy. The results obtained from the proposed hybrid platform show high accuracy compared to the results obtained from Matlab/Simulink/Simscape/Specialized Power System model using the same network configuration and parameters. The proposed CPU-GPU MMC model is shown to achieve a speed up of 27.5 folds, compared to the sequential algorithm of MMC model implemented in CPU.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.809
Threshold uncertainty score0.393

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHVDC Systems and Fault ProtectionFrench-language works237,207