MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Bibliometric Analysis of Canadian Engineering Higher Education Institutions and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals

2022· article· en· W4313562617 on OpenAlexaffabout
Wendy Ruth de Gomez, Mahima Patel, Christine Moresoli, Mary A. Wells

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSustainability in Higher Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlueprintSustainable developmentGeneral assemblyRenewable energyUniversal designEnvironmental economicsEconomic growthBusinessPolitical scienceComputer scienceEngineering managementEngineeringEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The seventeen Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) were established by the United Nations General Assembly in 2015 with the resolution called the 2030 Agenda. They are a visionary blueprint to achieve a better and more sustainable future for all people and the world by 2030 (United Nations General Assembly, 2015). Each of the SDGs have measurable targets set out to achieve the goal. For example, targets related to SDG 7- Affordable and Clean Energy include things like: 1) By 2030 ensure universal access to affordable, reliable, and modern energy services and 2) By 2030 increase substantially the share of renewable energy in the global energy mix.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesBibliometrics, Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesBibliometrics
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.2860.592
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSustainability in Higher EducationFrench-language works237,207