MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

On Propagation of Cyber-Attacks in Wide-Area Measurement Systems

2022· article· en· W4313562625 on OpenAlexaff
Hamed Sarjan, Amir Ameli, Mohsen Ghafouri

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Security and Resilience
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhasorSituation awarenessComputer scienceUnits of measurementComputer securityCyber-attackCyber-physical systemElectric power systemSCADAConstruct (python library)Distributed computingPower (physics)Computer networkEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Power grids are critical cyber-physical systems that employ advanced Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs), e.g., Wide Area Measurement Systems (WAMSs), to deliver the energy to end users reliably and efficiently. WAMSs are used to collect real-time data from Phasor Measurement Units (PMUs) to improve the operator's situational awareness, as well as to enhance real-time monitoring and control of power systems. The WAMS, however, is vulnerable to cyber-attacks due to the susceptibility of its components-such as PMUs and Phasor Data Concentrators (PDCs)-and the lack of embedded security mechanisms in its communication protocols. Some more-destructive cyber-attacks, such as malware injection, can propagate themselves into the components of a WAMS through the communication network. Thus, in such attacks, an attacker can compromise a larger number of components, resulting in more-severe consequences. Therefore, investigating the propagation of cyber-attacks in WAMSs and devising effective countermeasures for this problem are of paramount importance. On this basis, this paper initially develops a model to analyze cyber-attack propagation in WAMS. Then, the impacts of the attacker's capability and the network operator's defensive ability on attack propagation are investigated in detail. Such a study can elucidate the required security measures and defensive strategies to prevent the spread of cyber-attacks in WAMSs. Finally, a Learning-Based Framework (LBF) is developed to estimate the attacker's capability. The simulation results corroborate the effectiveness of the proposed LBF in estimating the attacker's capability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.191

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Grid Security and ResilienceFrench-language works237,207