MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Robust and Simple Long Horizon Health Estimation of Lithium-ion Batteries Using NARX Recurrent Neural Network

2022· article· en· W4313563253 on OpenAlexaff
Safieh Bamati, Hicham Chaoui, Hamid Gualous

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonlinear autoregressive exogenous modelArtificial neural networkSimple (philosophy)Computer scienceLithium (medication)Recurrent neural networkControl theory (sociology)Artificial intelligenceMedicineInternal medicineControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

State of health (SOH) prediction is critical in battery management systems to ensure the reliability and safety of battery operation for further cycle running. Electric vehicle applications require an accurate SOH estimation at a low computational burden. Machine Learning approaches have been successful in precise battery health prognostic. Most of the recent studies introduces hybrid structure for accurate state estimation. This study presents a model based on a solo nonlinear autoregressive with external input (NARX) network for Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). Validation on the NASA dataset shows excellent performance, with a root mean square error of less than 3% and a mean absolute error of less than 2% for validation batteries. Therefore, the method can accurately predict LIBS’s SOH based on historical data at lower computational complexity than the hybrid model. Therefore, this model is promising and practical for online applications for long-term prediction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.599
Threshold uncertainty score0.804

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC)Same topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207