Multivariate Beta Dirichlet Process-based Hidden Markov Models Applied to Medical Applications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) are known as one of the most capable statistical tools applied to various applications. Determining the number of hidden states has been an attractive topic in research. In this work, we assume a state space with a nonparametric structure. Moreover, we suppose emission probabilities follow multivariate Beta distribution (MB) which is a flexible and powerful distribution. We present multivariate Beta Dirichlet process mixture as a nonparametric extension of finite mixture model. This elegant structure provides more capability to model in fitting data. Such modifications will empower the classical framework of HMMs. We name our novel clustering method multivariate Beta Dirichlet process-based HMM. To learn our proposed model, we apply variational inference as a compelling approach. We evaluate our model performance by testing it on two medical applications including dementia detection and analyzing colonoscopy images. The results indicate that our proposed model has good potential and could be applied as a promising technique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it