MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Health Facility Factors Influencing the Implementation of PTBI during the Provision of Intrapartum and Perinatal Care in Embu County

2023· article· en· W4313579325 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Edith Wamuyu Ndwiga, Margaret Keraka, Maurice Onditi Kodhiambo

Bibliographic record

VenueEdith Cowan Journal of Medicine Nursing and Public health · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonprobability samplingSample (material)Quarter (Canadian coin)MedicineSample size determinationHealth facilityQualitative propertySimple random sampleEnvironmental healthFamily medicineNursingStatisticsPopulationGeographyHealth services

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of the study was to establish the health facility factors (HFF) influencing the implementation of PTBI during the provision of intrapartum and perinatal care in Embu County The study used a cross-sectional design. Random sampling technique was used to determine the sample size of 94 HCP, while the Purposive sampling technique was used to sample 24 client files (a quarter of the sample size) and 5 Key informants. The study was conducted in three hospitals in Embu County, Kenya. Questionnaires and document review guides were used to collect quantitative data and Key informant interview (KII) guides were used to collect qualitative data. Data analysis was done using SPSS version 21, descriptive statistics; Chi squires, Fisher’s test, and binary logistic model. Qualitative data were categorized into themes. Data findings were presented using tables and charts. Results: The findings in this study revealed that the majority of HCP in the maternity unit who agreed with the statement that adequacy of HFF influences implementation of PTBI were associated with the low implementation of PTBI as compared to those who disagreed. On the other hand, those HCP who agreed that there was adequate HFF were also associated with the low implementation of PTBI as compared to those HCP who disagreed. The findings further revealed there were inadequate staff, transport, and finances while drugs and equipment were adequate. The former three are important aspects in the implementation of PTBI and their inadequacy may lead to the low implementation of PTBI. In addition, this study also revealed that the highest number of respondents reported HFF affects the implementation of PTBI to a large extent as compared to those who reported moderately and low extent respectively. Respondents’ responses were echoed by the 5 KIIs of whom, four reported that the level of implementation is affected by HFF to a moderate and large extent respectively. In addition, the study recommends the county government consider improving HFF by; providing facilities for KMC, improving transport facilities, recruiting more skilled staff, and increasing funding in the field of midwifery/reproductive health to enhance the implementation of PTBI. Adequate funding will enhance staff recruitment, maintenance of transport, and timely procurement of drugs and equipment. Consequently, promoting the implementation of PTBI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.169

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEdith Cowan Journal of Medicine Nursing and Public health→Same topicGlobal Maternal and Child Health→French-language works237,207→