Exploring the characteristics and driving forces of orchard expansion in ecological fragile region: A case study of three typical counties in the Loess Plateau
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Loess Plateau exemplifies the type of ecologically fragile region that faces severe poverty challenges in China. Orchards have expanded rapidly over the past few decades and now constitute a considerable part of local economy. Not only do the characteristics of orchard expansion affect local economic development, but also exert additional pressure on the ecological environment. Therefore, it is essential for sustainable development on the Loess Plateau to investigate the characteristics and driving forces of orchard expansion. The Fuxian, Luochuan, Huangling, three typical orchard planting counties were chosen as the study area. Firstly, the orchard was extracted from the land use/cover classification from 1990–2020. It broadens the research approach to the identification of expansion cash crops by using the combination of linear spectral mixture analysis (LSMA) and decision tree. Secondly, the spatiotemporal dynamics of orchard expansion were quantitatively investigated based on spatial geometry center shift, physical geographical features, landscape pattern and orchard planting suitability. Then, we constructed an evaluation indicators system to detect the feature importance and partial dependence of different factors by random forest regression. It is more innovative to employ the machine learning method to investigate driving forces. Finally, the linkages between planting suitability and orchard expansion were further discussed, and subsequent policies were proposed. Findings demonstrated the orchard had continuously expanded over the past 30 years, with the fastest expansion rate during 1990–2005. Increased cohesion was accompanied by a shift in the orchard’s spatial distribution to the north central region and highly suitable planting regions. Slope turned out to be the primary factor affecting the orchard expansion. In the future, regions with aging orchard but high planting suitability should be the preferred choice for orchard expansion. Additionally, the transportation connectivity and governmental assistance are crucial considerations for the future planning of the orchard.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".