MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313586050 · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2022.1045910

Relationships between cerebral small vessel diseases markers and cognitive performance in stroke-free patients with atrial fibrillation

2023· article· en· W4313586050 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wendan Tao, Junfeng Liu, Chen Ye, William Robert Kwapong, Anmo Wang, Zhetao Wang, Shi Chen, Ming Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Aging Neuroscience · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersWest China Hospital, Sichuan UniversitySichuan UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAtrial fibrillationMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineStroke (engine)CognitionPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is related to an increased risk of cognitive dysfunction. Besides clinically overt stroke, AF can damage the brain via several pathophysiological mechanisms. We aimed to assess the potential mediating role of cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) and cognitive performance in individuals with AF. Methods Stroke-free individuals with AF from the cardiological outpatient clinic at West China Hospital of Sichuan University were recruited. Extensive neuropsychological testing tools were assessed including global function, domains of attention, executive functions, learning, and memory. 3 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used for SVD markers assessment of white matter hyperintensities (WMH), lacunes, cerebral microbleeds (CMBs), and enlarged perivascular spaces (EPVS). The correlation between SVD markers and cognitive measures was analyzed by multivariate linear regression models. Results We finally enrolled 158 participants, of whom 95 (60.1%) were males. In multivariate models, the presence of lacunes independently associated with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (Model 1: ß = 0.52, Model 2: ß = 0.55), Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test-immediate and delayed recall (Model 1: ß = 0.49; ß = 0.69; Model 2: ß = 0.53; ß = 0.73) as well as Stroop-Acorrect (Model 1: ß = 0.12; Model 2: ß = 0.13), while total WMH severity independently associated with Strooptime-A (Model 1: ß = 0.24; Model 3: ß = 0.27), Strooptime-B (Model 1: ß = 0.17; Model 3: ß = 0.17), Strooptime-C (Model 1: ß = 0.22; Model 3: ß = 0.21) and Shape Trail Test-A (Model 1: ß = 0.17; Model 3: ß = 0.16). Conclusion In our cohort of stroke-free individuals with AF, lacunes, and WMHs were independently associated with cognitive decline while EPVS and CMBs did not show significance. Assessment of SVD MRI markers might be valuable for cognition risk stratification and facilitate optimal management of patients with AF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Aging NeuroscienceSame topicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchFrench-language works237,207