MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract P037: Association between circulating osteoprotegerin levels and estimated risk of <i>BRCA1</i>-associated breast cancer

2023· article· en· W4313591640 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah Park, Tasnim Zaman, Shana J. Kim, Jennifer D. Brooks, Andy Kin On Wong, Jan Lubiński, Steven A. Narod, Leonardo Salmena, Joanne Kotsopoulos

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Prevention Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Canadian institutionsWomen's College HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreast cancerOsteoprotegerinMedicineOncologyInternal medicineRANKLBiomarkerCancerFamily historyRisk factorReceptorBiologyGeneticsActivator (genetics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Purpose: Dysregulation of the receptor activator of nuclear factor κB (RANK) pathway may contribute to the pathogenesis of BRCA1-associated breast cancer. Specifically, lower levels of osteoprotegerin (OPG), an endogenous inhibitor of RANK-ligand (RANKL) that competes with RANK for RANKL binding, have been reported among women with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant (mutation) in the BRCA1 gene. It has been suggested that lower OPG levels may be associated with an increased risk of breast cancer, proposing that OPG may serve as a biomarker for breast cancer risk. Whether OPG is associated with estimated breast cancer risk remains unknown. The goal of this study was to evaluate the relationship between OPG and the estimated risk of breast cancer in women with a BRCA1 mutation. Methods: Women were eligible for inclusion if they had a BRCA1 mutation, were between ages 18 and 79, had a pedigree, had no prior history of cancer, had not undergone prophylactic bilateral mastectomy and provided a blood sample available for OPG analysis. Detailed information on various risk factors (i.e., reproductive, hormonal, family history) was collected using biennial questionnaires. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to quantify serum OPG levels (pg/mL). Risk of breast cancer was estimated using Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm version 6 incorporated in the CanRisk tool. The relationship between OPG and estimated lifetime (up to age 80) and ten-year (age 40–50) risks of breast cancer was evaluated using quantile regression analyses. Analyses were further stratified by age (≤50 vs &amp;gt;50 years). Results: A total of 539 women were included in the analysis. The median age at blood collection was 39 years (18–77 years). For lifetime breast cancer risk, a 1 standard deviation (SD; 38.40 pg/ml) increase in OPG level was associated with a 5.4% lower risk at the 25th percentile (P ≤ 0.001), a 4.2% lower risk at the 50th percentile (P ≤ 0.001), and a 1.5% lower risk at the 75th percentile (P ≤ 0.001). For ten-year breast cancer risk, a 1 SD increase in OPG level was associated with a 1.2% lower risk at the 25th percentile (P ≤ 0.001), a 0.8% lower risk at the 50th percentile (P ≤ 0.001), and a 0.8% lower risk at the 75th percentile (P = 0.005). The association between OPG and both estimated risks did not vary in the analysis stratified by age (≤50 vs &amp;gt;50 years). Conclusion: Higher circulating OPG levels were associated with significantly lower estimated lifetime and ten-year risks of BRCA1-associated breast cancer. These associations were stronger for women at a lower risk of developing lifetime breast cancer. Further research is needed to determine whether integrating circulating OPG levels can improve existing risk prediction models. These data contribute to ongoing interest in the role of RANK signaling in mammary tumorigenesis. Inhibiting RANK signaling may therefore be a potential target for breast cancer prevention in women with a BRCA1 mutation and other high-risk populations. Citation Format: Sarah S. Park, Tasnim Zaman, Shana J. Kim, Jennifer D. Brooks, Andy K. O. Wong, Jan Lubiński, Steven A. Narod, Leonardo Salmena, Joanne Kotsopoulos. Association between circulating osteoprotegerin levels and estimated risk of BRCA1-associated breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Precision Prevention, Early Detection, and Interception of Cancer; 2022 Nov 17-19; Austin, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Can Prev Res 2023;16(1 Suppl): Abstract nr P037.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.157
GPT teacher head0.450
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Prevention ResearchSame topicGenetic factors in colorectal cancerFrench-language works237,207