Exponentially decaying solutions for models with delayed and advanced arguments: Nonlinear effects in linear differential equations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We consider a scalar linear mixed differential equation with several terms, both delayed and advanced arguments and a bounded right-hand side. Assuming that the deviations of the argument are bounded, we present sufficient conditions when there exists a unique bounded solution on the positive half-line. Explicit tests for a bounded solution of a homogeneous equation to decay exponentially are obtained. Existence of exponentially decaying solutions for this class of differential equations is studied for the first time, and we illustrate sharpness of the results with examples. We show that the standard approach when convergence of all solutions is stated does not work for mixed equations; in addition to an exponentially decaying, there may be a growing solution. All the coefficients and the mixed arguments are assumed to be Lebesgue measurable functions, not necessarily continuous. Though the equation is linear, some properties, as well as the methods applied, are more typical for nonlinear models, for example, fixed-point theorems are used in the proofs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".