A mechanochemically created durable <i>dynamic</i> superhydrophilic‐ <i>like</i> surface
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Superhydrophilicity (superwettability) is generally defined as either a static water contact angle near 0° or water completely wetting the surface. Here, we show that there is a superhydrophilic‐ like surface that has a large static water contact angle but demonstrates superhydrophilicity in its dynamic water contact performance. We found that polyethylene terephthalate (PET) surfaces showed such behavior following mechanical abrasion with sandpaper. We have evaluated the wettability of the abraded PET surfaces by using static water contact angle (SWCA) measurements and the dynamic water contact performance (DWCP) of impacting droplets, the latter including water sprays, water immersion, anti‐fogging and water droplet impact tests. The water was found to completely wet the abraded PET surfaces on spraying or immersion, although the measured SWCA was as high as 70°, similar to that of the unabraded PET surface. For the abraded PET surface, both the water layer thickness on water immersion and the subsequent drying time were similar to those of an especially coated superhydrophilic layer on the unabraded surface. Accordingly, superhydrophilicity may be determined by the process used to measure it.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".