MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313609050 · doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.1128938

Editorial: Multimodal brain image fusion: Methods, evaluations, and applications

2023· editorial· en· W4313609050 on OpenAlexaff
Yü Liu, Jiayi Ma, Qiang Zhang, Wei Wei, Xun Chen, Zheng Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Neuroscience · 2023
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Image Fusion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImage fusionComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceImage (mathematics)Computer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multimodal medical imaging is playing an increasingly critical role in the diagnosis and treatment of various brain diseases like glioma, Alzheimer, ischemic stroke, epilepsy, etc. Medical images with different modalities such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) focus on different categories of pathological information. Medical image fusion aims to combine the complementary information captured by different imaging modalities for better disease diagnosis and treatment. In recent years, medical image fusion has emerged as a very active topic with various fusion methods being proposed. In addition, the performance evaluation and downstream applications of medical image fusion are also attracting more and more attention. This Research Topic focuses on reporting advanced studies related to multimodal brain image fusion, including image fusion methods, objective evaluation approaches and specific applications in clinical problems. Twelve of the sixteen articles submitted to this Research Topic were accepted for publication after a thorough peer-review process. A summary of the key research findings of these works are provided from three aspects as below.Multimodal brain image registration, fusion and fusion quality evaluation: Image registration is the prerequisite of many medical image processing tasks such as fusion and segmentation. Wang et al. proposed a medical image registration method based on the bounded generalized Gaussian mixture model (BGGMM), which can thoroughly describe the joint intensity vector distribution of the image pixels and highlight the details of the image. The mixture model is formulated based on a maximum likelihood framework, and is solved by an expectation-maximization algorithm. With regard to image fusion methods, Wang et al. presented a disentangled representation based multimodal brain image fusion method via group lasso penalty using an auto-encoder-based deep learning framework, aiming to fully exploit the redundancy and complement prior relationships among multimodal source images. In their method, a complementary group lasso penalty is designed to promote the disentanglement ability and ensure the complementary feature maps of significant modality information. This study demonstrated that the disentangled representations can improve the interpretability of feature representation, leading to better fusion quality. Zhang et al. proposed a local extreme map guided multimodal brain image fusion method to improve the feature extraction ability of the guided image filter. By iteratively applying this local extreme map guided image filter, the proposed method is able to extract multiple scales of bright and dark features from the multimodal brain images, and integrate these salient features into one informative fused image. In addition, the proposed scheme can be incorporated with various guided filters or other similar filters in pursuit of improving their feature extraction ability. In comparison to the great attention paid to the study of image fusion methods, few works have explored dedicated quality assessment approaches for medical image fusion. To address this issue, Tang et al. proposed a novel quality assessment method for medial image fusion based on the conditional generative adversarial networks with the mean opinion scores (MOS) of the radiologists as the guiding condition. Their experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms several commonly-used quality assessment metrics of image fusion, with excellent agreement with subjective evaluations.Applications of multimodal brain image fusion: Multimodal medical image fusion has verified to be of great significance in various related high-level vision tasks such as classification and segmentation. Yi et al. proposed a multimodal classification architecture for the severity diagnosis of glaucoma. The proposed method integrates fundus images and gray scale images of the visual field as the input of the classification model. In addition, they introduced a plug-and-play classifier that adopts the Vision Transformer to extract the global dependencies of images, leading to improved accuracy of the diagnostic task. Li et al. conducted a study to investigate the stage of bi-modal fusion based on EEG and fNIRS for the classification task in hybrid brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). A Y-shaped neural network that fuses the bi-modal information in different stages was proposed. This study demonstrated that the early-stage fusion of EEG and fNIRS have significantly higher performance compared to middle-stage fusion and late-stage fusion. Liu et al. introduced both pixel-level and feature-level multimodal image fusion technique for brain tumor segmentation, aiming to achieve more sufficient and finer utilization of multimodal information. They presented a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based 3D pixel-level image fusion network to enrich the input modalities of the segmentation model and designed an attention-based feature fusion module for multimodal feature refinement. Xu et al. proposed a hybrid feature extraction network for medical image segmentation based on CNNs and Transformer. The proposed network can integrate the advantages of Transformer in capturing global contextual information and CNNs in extracting local features. Additionally, a multi-dimensional statistical feature extraction module is designed to strengthen low-dimensional texture features and enhance the segmentation performance. Tian et al. presented a method to combine light sheet microscopy (LSM) data with magnetic resonance histology (MRH) of the same specimen to restore the morphology of the LSM images to the in-skull geometry. They developed an image processing pipeline to restore the correct brain morphology of 3-dimensional cleared, stained mouse brain by registering the cleared brain data to MRH of the same specimen. Chen et al. introduced the minimally invasive puncture and drainage (MIPD) surgery using mixed reality holographic navigation technology (MRHNT). In their scheme, the holographic image and real head are integrated. By wearing mixed reality holographic equipment, the precise location of intracranial hematomas, tumors, ventricles, and other structures with the perspective function can be understood, which laid a theoretical foundation for implementation in neurosurgery.Joint analysis of multimodal data: Mononen et al. conducted a study to evaluate the across-tasks variability of magnetoencephalography (MEG)-functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) relationship using data recorded during three distinct naming tasks from the same set of participants. Experiments results demonstrated that the MEG-fMRI correlation pattern varies according to the performed task. In addition, the electromagnetic-hemodynamic correlation could serve as a more sensitive proxy for task-dependent neural engagement in cognitive tasks than isolated within-modality measures. Rudolf et al. characterized the impact of the ballistocardiographic (BCG) artifact on resting-state EEG spectral properties and compared the effectiveness of seven common BCG correction methods to preserve EEG spectral features. They also assessed if these methods retained posterior alpha power reactivity to an eyes closure-opening task and compared the results from EEG-informed fMRI analysis using different BCG correction approaches. We appreciate the contributions of all the authors, the reviewers, and the editorial board members for contributing to this Research Topic. We hope that this Research Topic can make a broader impact on the study of multimodal brain image fusion including methods, evaluations and applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.149
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in NeuroscienceSame topicAdvanced Image Fusion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207