An Integrated Optical Circuit Architecture for Inverse-Designed Silicon Photonic Components
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, we demonstrate a compact toolkit of inverse-designed, topologically optimized silicon photonic devices that are arranged in a "plug-and-play" fashion to realize many different photonic integrated circuits, both passive and active, each with a small footprint. The silicon-on-insulator 1550-nm toolkit contains a 2 × 2 3-dB splitter/combiner, a 2 × 2 waveguide crossover, and a 2 × 2 all-forward add-drop resonator. The resonator can become a 2 × 2 electro-optical crossbar switch by means of the thermo-optical effect, phase-change cladding, or free-carrier injection. For each of the ten circuits demonstrated in this work, the toolkit of photonic devices enables the compact circuit to achieve low insertion loss and low crosstalk. By adopting the sophisticated inverse-design approach, the design structure, shape, and sizing of each individual device can be made more flexible to better suit the architecture of the greater circuit. For a compact architecture, we present a unified, parallel waveguide circuit framework into which the devices are designed to fit seamlessly, thus enabling low-complexity circuit design.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".