MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313643885 · doi:10.1109/tnse.2023.3234720

Connectivity Preservation and Collision Avoidance in Multi-Agent Systems Using Model Predictive Control

2023· article· en· W4313643885 on OpenAlexafffund
Ahmed ElHamamsy, Farhad Aghili, Amir G. Aghdam

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsCanadian Space AgencyConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsModel predictive controlCollision avoidanceComputer sciencePosition (finance)Control theory (sociology)Distributed computingController (irrigation)Multi-agent systemField (mathematics)Scheme (mathematics)Topology (electrical circuits)Control (management)CollisionArtificial intelligenceEngineeringMathematicsComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an innovative predictive control scheme based on a potential field in order to maintain the connectivity of a flock of agents in a leader-follower configuration with dynamic topology. We consider a group of agents navigating in an environment with obstacles towards their target. The followers avoid collisions with each other and obstacles without using any communication links. It is also required to maintain connectivity with the leader, which is unidentified to the followers. The potential field is dynamically updated by introducing time-varying weighted links between the followers to preserve connectivity as we assume only the leader knows the target position. The values of these weights are adjusted continuously according to agents' trajectories by which the critical neighbours of each agent are determined. The superior performance of the proposed predictive controller for navigation of agents to quickly reach their target is demonstrated comparatively by simulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Network Science and EngineeringSame topicDistributed Control Multi-Agent SystemsFrench-language works237,207