MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313645970 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.170805

Methodological Approach to the Implementation of Planning in the Management System of Innovative and Production Activities of Enterprises for the Sustainable Economic Development of the Region

2022· article· en· W4313645970 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Roksolana Ivanova, Natalia Fedynets, Olha Viunyk, Ilona Androshchuk, Olga Guk

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicEconomic and Technological Systems Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProduction (economics)Process managementSustainable developmentProduction planningFunction (biology)Process (computing)BusinessOriginalityComputer scienceManagement scienceEngineeringEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of the study involves the presentation of a methodological approach to planning in the management system of innovative and production activities of enterprises for the sustainable economic development of the region. To achieve the goals set, a number of methods were used that formed the research methodology. The main practical method that was used is the method of functional modeling and graphical demonstration of the process. The method is a modeling technique with specific goals and sub-processes to achieve it (IDEF). The results of the study demonstrated the formation of decompositions of models, each of which offers certain areas for improving planning in the management system of innovative and production activities of enterprises for the sustainable economic development of the region. The model was presented in the practice of several enterprises in a particular region. The model has all the principles of effective application for the implementation of the planning function in the management system of innovative and production activities of enterprises for the sustainable economic development of the region. Originality is manifested in the application of existing methods in a new field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.008
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and PlanningSame topicEconomic and Technological Systems AnalysisFrench-language works237,207