MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313652744 · doi:10.33137/jrmh.v6i1.39816

Losing a Team Member to Suicide in a Mental Healthcare Setting

2023· article· en· W4313652744 on OpenAlexaff
Dylan Zambrano, Gwenne Woodward

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Recovery in Mental Health · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSuicide and Self-Harm Studies
Canadian institutionsOntario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthcareHealth careMental healthPsychologyMental health careNursingMedicinePsychiatryPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

What do we as a society do when someone dies?It depends on our culture, societal, and familial norms.Perhaps we go to the family that experienced the loss of a loved one to express condolences.We would likely bring food so the family does not have to focus on such mundane things as feeding themselves, and yet, no one ever feels like eating.We might send a card, flowers, and attend a service or a Celebration of Life, if there is one.As time goes on, there might be less contact while the family lives their new reality and maybe wonders why the Earth does not stop spinning for even a little while.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score0.749

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Recovery in Mental HealthSame topicSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesFrench-language works237,207