Soil Interaction of H-shaped Steel-RC Stepped Pile of Integral Abutment Bridge: Experimental Evaluation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reinforced concrete piles (RC) in integral abutment bridges (IABs) are challenging to meet the longitudinal deformation of bridges with significant lateral stiffness. The H-shaped steel (HS) piles are costly and prone to corrosion. This paper proposes a new form of pile comprised of HS and RC piles in series to meet the longitudinal deformation demand of IABs. Tests were conducted for one HS pile under reciprocating low-cycle pseudo-static test and two HS-RC stepped piles with different bending stiffness ratios of HS/RC (0.25 and 0.5) using the HS-RC pile test model,. The influence of the stiffness ratio on the mechanical behavior of stepped pile-soil was studied. The mechanical behavior of the stepped pile was also compared with single HS and RC piles. and the applicability of the m and p - y curve methods to the calculation of horizontal displacement of stepped pile is discussed. The results show that the elastic deformation range of the HS pile is 2 mm to 25 mm, and its horizontal deformation capacity and bearing capacity are excellent. As the stiffness ratio increases, the stepped pile-soil system’s yield displacement and yield load increased. The stiffness ratio has no significant effect on the failure mode of the piles. The hysteretic ring of the stepped pile shows a squeezing shape at the initial loading stage, but becomes a full spindle in the later loading stage. The stepped pile shows an excellent energy consumption effect and a horizontal deformation ability, indicating it is suitable for IABs. The m method has better accuracy only up to 2 mm displacement, while the p - y curve method still has higher accuracy within 15 mm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".