MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313681467 · doi:10.5206/tba.v4i1.14924

The Temporalities of Agony

2023· article· en· W4313681467 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Lucile Cordonnier

Bibliographic record

Venuetba Journal of Art Media and Visual Culture · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Cultural and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTemporalityTemporalitiesPlague (disease)PaintingComposition (language)Subject (documents)ArtHistoryArt historyLiteratureGenealogyPhilosophyAncient historyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1893, painter Maurice Denis collaborated with his friend, the novelist André Gide, for the illustrations of Le Voyage d'Urien. This short novel narrates the story of a symbolic and fantasised journey, which leads Urien and his fellow travelers to land on an island struck by the plague. With the lithograph on page 48, representing four plague-stricken individuals, I argue that Denis transposed his theories on the decorative, formulated in his "Définition du Néo-Traditionnisme" in 1890. I contend in this essay that through this lithograph Denis synchronizes multiple temporal levels by representing the same figure four times. On the level of the subject, the agony of the plague-stricken relates to a private time distinct from society’s public time. Moreover, the sequencing of the disease into four stages partakes in the journey towards absolution. Regarding the composition of the work, the decorative elements belong to their own temporality which is integrated on the spatiality of the page and recalls a so-called “archaic” and “primitive” time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.034
Scholarly communication0.0110.009
Open science0.0010.010
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuetba Journal of Art Media and Visual CultureSame topicDiverse Cultural and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207