Novel genetically engineered H3.3G34R model reveals cooperation with ATRX loss in upregulation of<i>Hoxa</i>cluster genes and promotion of neuronal lineage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Pediatric high-grade gliomas (pHGGs) are aggressive pediatric CNS tumors and an important subset are characterized by mutations in H3F3A, the gene that encodes Histone H3.3 (H3.3). Substitution of Glycine at position 34 of H3.3 with either Arginine or Valine (H3.3G34R/V), was recently described and characterized in a large cohort of pHGG samples as occurring in 5–20% of pHGGs. Attempts to study the mechanism of H3.3G34R have proven difficult due to the lack of knowledge regarding the cell-of-origin and the requirement for co-occurring mutations for model development. We sought to develop a biologically relevant animal model of pHGG to probe the downstream effects of the H3.3G34R mutation in the context of vital co-occurring mutations. Methods We developed a genetically engineered mouse model (GEMM) that incorporates PDGF-A activation, TP53 loss and the H3.3G34R mutation both in the presence and loss of Alpha thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linked (ATRX), which is commonly mutated in H3.3G34 mutant pHGGs. Results We demonstrated that ATRX loss significantly increases tumor latency in the absence of H3.3G34R and inhibits ependymal differentiation in the presence of H3.3G34R. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that ATRX loss in the context of H3.3G34R upregulates Hoxa cluster genes. We also found that the H3.3G34R overexpression leads to enrichment of neuronal markers but only in the context of ATRX loss. Conclusions This study proposes a mechanism in which ATRX loss is the major contributor to many key transcriptomic changes in H3.3G34R pHGGs. Accession number GSE197988.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".