Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Maghreb Review, Vol. 39, 4, 2014 © The Maghreb Review 2014 This publication is printed on longlife paper EDITORIAL NOTE This issue contains the third selection of the papers from our international conference on ‘Colonial Heritage in the Middle East and the Maghreb: the Shaping of Hopes and Perspectives’ Mansfield College, Oxford 24-25 June 2013. The following papers were presented: • Sam Cherribi and Matthew Pesce, The Motivations for Moroccan Liberalization • Yehudit Ronen, Conflicting national Identities in Colonial and PostColonial Morocco: Between Arab Nationalism and Jewish Zionism • Rachid Agrour, La période trouble de l’indépendance dans le Sud marocain. Le cas du capitaine Moureau et de l’Armée de Libération (1956-1957) • Khalid Ben-Srhir, Rivalités européennes au Maroc précolonial: La mission de Charles Euan-Smith à Fez en 1892 • E. Ann McDougall, Abolition as Politics in 21st Century Mauritania: Colonial policy, Islamic law and contemporary slavery in the face of democracy • Ylenia Rocchini, The use of Islamic Law in the colonial era: the reshaping of Algerian repudiation by French legislative interventions and judicial practices • M.A. Sibel Inal (née Aydin), Complex Development of Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt: From Anti-Colonial Movement to Global Jihadist Preaching • Allan Christelow, Algeria’s Transition from the Imperial Era to the Global Era 1939-1946) as Seen Through Illustrated Magazines for Soldiers • Habiba Boumlik, Muslim and European Encounters Through Travel Writing: 17th—19th Centuries • Nina Salouâ Studer, “Will There Be Any Long Term Effects?” The Power of Psychiatry in French Colonial North Africa • David Beamish, Producing ‘Authentic’ Perspective: The Writings of Ismail Hamid • Nigar Gozalova, The Role of British Military Experts in the Formation of the Qajar Troops in the First Quarter of the 19th Century • Ahmed Farouk, Activités des Consulats britanniques au Maroc Durant la période dite de pacification 372 MOHAMED BEN-MADANI • Ángela Hernández Moreno, Le Rôle des Consuls dans la Construction des Réalités Politiques au Maghreb: Les Consuls Espagnols de Mogador au XIXème siècle • Jamil Abun-Nasr, Hostility to Muslims in Europe: Causes and Modes of Expression • Michael B. Bishku, The Transformation of the South Caucasus Region: From Soviet Republics to Independent States • Michael Gunter, The Civil War in Syria: Colonial Heritage and Failed Nation-State Building in the Middle East • Abdelwahab Hechiche, The Axis Paris-London-Washington and the Mediterranean: From Suez to Benghazi Via Tunis: 1956-2013 • Rami Ginat, Egypt, and the Unity of the Nile Valley: A Territorial Nationalism or a Colonialism? • Mehmet S. Tosun, Centralized Government Structure in the Middle East and North Africa Region from a Historical Perspective • Odile Moreau, Printemps Arabe, Héritage Historique, Turquie et Transition Démocratique en Tunisie Note: three of the papers which were presented at the conference will not be published in these proceedings: David Beamish and Rami Ginat have not submitted their papers to The Maghreb Review as agreed before the conference. The paper by Yehudit Ronen: “Conflicting national Identities in colonial and post-colonial Morocco: Between Arab nationalism and Jewish Zionism” will be published in The Maghreb Review, Volume 40, No. 2, 2015 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: We should like to thank all conference speakers, participants, session chairmen (Dr Michael Brett, Dr Ahmed Al-Shahi, Professor Michael Gunter) and Mansfield College staff, who made the conference a success. Special thanks goes to Professor C. Edmund Bosworth, Professor Jamil Abun-Nasr, Professor Allan Christelow, and Mr Ronald L. Nettler of Mansfield College for their continued help and advice. CONFERENCE FUNDS: A small proportion from each subscription that The Maghreb Review receives is put in a deposit account for use for future conferences. Please recommend your Libraries and friends’ Libraries, particularly in the Arab World, to subscribe, as there is still a need to increase subscriptions with institutional Libraries. EDITORIAL NOTE 373 SUBSCRIBERS Since our first volume in June 1976, sales have increased from 50 to 992 Institutional subscribers in 2014 in the following countries: Australia 16 Kenya 1 Austria 4 Korea, Rep of 4 Bangladesh 4 Lebanon 2 Belgium 38 Malaysia 15 Cameroun 2 Malta 4 Canada 45 Mexico 1 China 5 Morocco 2 Czech Rep 6 Netherlands 42 Denmark 13 Norway 13 Finland 10 Pakistan 2...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.016 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.017 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".