MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313825155 · doi:10.58250/jnanabha.2022.52123

NEIGHBORHOOD TOPOLOGICAL INDICES OF METAL-ORGANIC NETWORKS

2022· article· en· W4313825155 on OpenAlexaff
M. C. Shanmukha, Anil Kumar, N. S. Basavarajappa, A. Usha

Bibliographic record

Venuejnanabha · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Drug Discovery Methods
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTopological indexReciprocalStability (learning theory)MetalIndex (typography)PorosityMetal ions in aqueous solutionChemical stabilitySurface (topology)Topology (electrical circuits)Group (periodic table)Materials scienceChemistryComputational chemistryComputer scienceMathematicsOrganic chemistryGeometryCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A group of chemical compounds containing organic ligands and metal ions(clusters) called as Metal organic networks (MON s). These are found as one, two and three dimensional structures of porous and subordinate class of coordination polymers. The characteristics of MON s are high surface area, large pore volume, different morphology and very good chemical stability. The applications of MON s includes gas storage, heterogeneous catalysis and sensing of various gases. The stability and characteristics of these networks have become important because of the above said characteristics. The numerical invariants used to predict the physicochemical characteristics and bioactivities of chemical compounds known as topological indices. In our proposed work, we compute neighborhood redefined first Zagreb index, neighborhood redefined second Zagreb index and Generalized Reciprocal Sanskruti index for two different MON s.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.875
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuejnanabhaSame topicComputational Drug Discovery MethodsFrench-language works237,207