Volatility and dependence in cryptocurrency and financial markets: a copula approach
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We use a semiparametric GARCH-in-Mean copula model to examine the volatility dynamics and tail dependence between cryptocurrency markets and financial markets. We do not find any statistically significant tail dependence between the financial and cryptocurrency markets, but we find lower tail dependence between Bitcoin and stock returns. There is lower tail dependence among Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Litecoin, and the lower tail dependence between Ethereum and Litecoin returns is the strongest. The GARCH-in-Mean model shows that the uncertainty effect on cryptocurrency returns is not statistically significant, while uncertainty has a negative and statistically significant effect on Bitcoin returns. The fact that there is no tail dependence between cryptocurrency and the interest rate or the effective exchange rate of U.S. dollar suggests that cryptocurrency could offer safe haven, defined as an asset that is uncorrelated with stocks and bonds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it