Twisted magnetic field in star formation processes of L1521 F revealed by submillimeter dual-band polarimetry using the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Understanding the initial conditions of star formation requires both observational studies and theoretical works taking into account the magnetic field, which plays an important role in star formation processes. Herein, we study the young nearby dense cloud core L1521 F [n(H2) ∼104−6 cm−3] in the Taurus Molecular Cloud. This dense core hosts a 0.2 M⊙ protostar, categorized as a very low luminosity object with complex velocity structures, particularly in the vicinity of the protostar. To trace the magnetic field within the dense core, we conducted high-sensitivity submillimeter polarimetry of the dust continuum at λ = 850 μm and 450 μm using the POL-2 polarimeter situated in front of the SCUBA-2 submillimeter bolometer camera on the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope. This was compared with millimeter polarimetry taken at λ = 3.3 mm with ALMA. The magnetic field was detected at λ = 850 μm in the peripheral region, which is threaded in a north–south direction, while the central region traced at λ = 450 μm shows a magnetic field with an east–west direction, i.e., orthogonal to that of the peripheral region. Magnetic field strengths are estimated to be ∼70 μG and 200 μG in the peripheral and central regions, respectively, using the Davis–Chandrasekhar–Fermi method. The resulting mass-to-flux ratio of three times larger than that of magnetically critical state for both regions indicates that L 1521 F is magnetically supercritical, i.e., gravitational forces dominate over magnetic turbulence forces. Combining observational data with magnetohydrodynamic simulations, detailed parameters of the morphological properties of this puzzling object are derived for the first time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".