MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313856460 · doi:10.3917/rdm1.060.0223

« Les Blancs sont des fouineurs, les Noirs sont mal élevés »

2023· article· fr· W4313856460 on OpenAlex
Anne Warfield Rawls, Waverly Duck

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue du MAUSS · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsLibrary and Archives Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soutenant que les différences raciales reposent sur des manières tacites d’agir devenues des formes institutionnalisées d’interaction, cet article insiste sur la nécessité de développer une nouvelle façon d’appréhender la race et le racisme. Elle consiste à déplacer l’attention, depuis les macrostructures qui produisent et reproduisent les inégalités, et leurs manifestations individuelles (conscientes ou inconscientes), vers les attentes ancrées dans l’interaction sociale, qui rendent ces inégalités toujours si profondes. L’analyse porte ici les séquences d’ouverture des conversations entre Américains s’identifiant comme Noirs ou Blancs et les différences significatives dans ces attentes qui rendent la compréhension mutuelle entre les personnes de races différentes non seulement problématique, mais impossible dans de nombreux cas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.552
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.413
GPT teacher head0.464
Teacher spread0.051 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it