MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Design and Implementation of Fine Tuning Phase Shifting Trimmer in III-V Semiconductor Technologies

2022· article· en· W4313886501 on OpenAlexaff
Shakeeb Abdullah, Wenyu Zhou, Rony E. Amaya

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhase shift modulePhase (matter)DiodeTransistorSchematicComputer scienceOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceElectrical engineeringTopology (electrical circuits)PhysicsEngineeringInsertion lossVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The need for high-precision digitally-controlled phase shifting blocks that can traverse less than 5<sup>o</sup> of phase change is quickly arising, especially in domains of complex phased-array systems that are employing double digit of network elements. This paper explores the possibility of implementing such phase shifting blocks on III-V Semiconductor ICs - more specifically in InGaAs and InP - using the phase shifting trimmer architecture. Simulation results (schematic and post-layout extraction) show that it can be done in both InGaAs and InP; where both technology managed to achieve phase steps of less than 0.650o of phase change per bit for an 8-bit phase shifting trimmer. All trimmer phase change responses were linear in InGaAs and InP for all 8-bits of operation. Regular diodes were used in InGaAs; while makeshift HBTs as diode connected transistors were used as the capacitive loadings in the InP trimmer. Both trimmers (InGaAs and InP) were able to traverse small phase changes per bit (sub < 1<inf>o</inf>) with good return loss performance (S11) better than −12dB, and insertion loss (S<inf>21</inf>) of less than 0. 44dB for all bits and phase changes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.438

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207