Distributed Robust Platooning Control for Heterogeneous Vehicle Group under Parametric Uncertainty and Hybrid Attacks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study addresses the problem of distributed robust control resistance to vehicle parametric uncertainty and hybrid attacks in heterogeneous vehicular platoon systems. First, an invaded heterogeneous vehicular platoon system is modeled accompanied by the technique of inverse model compensation to deal with the problem of non-linearities in longitudinal dynamics, a nominal vehicle mass is introduced to tackle the problem of heterogeneity and variability of vehicle masses. Besides, we quantize the effects of false-data injection (FDI) and message-delay (MD) attacks and integrate them into the proposed heterogeneous platoon system. Additionally, to obtain the desired inner-vehicle stability of a heterogeneous platoon, an inner-vehicle${H}_\infty $distributed robust stable controller is presented based on Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional. Finally, a${\mathcal{L}}_2$-based string stability criterion is put forward to weaken the attacks' effects when they propagate along with the platoon. To explain the superiority of the derived theory more directly, simulations with two different control methods about the heterogeneous platoon under hybrid attacks are provided. The results show that, compared to regular platoon control method, the proposed robust controller performs better in achieving the desired inter-vehicle spacing tracking and can maintain string stability of the platoon.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".