An Enhanced and Secure Trust-Aware Improved GSO for Encrypted Data Sharing in the Internet of Things
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wireless sensors and actuator networks (WSNs) are the physical layer implementation used for many smart applications in this decade in the form of the Internet of Things (IoT) and cyber-physical systems (CPS). Even though many research concerns in WSNs have been answered, the evolution of the WSN into an IoT network has exposed it to many new technical issues, including data security, multi-sensory multi-communication capabilities, energy utilization, and the age of information. Cluster-based data collecting in the Internet of Things has the potential to address concerns with data freshness and energy efficiency. However, it may not offer reliable network data security. This research presents an improved method for data sharing and cluster head (CH) selection using the hybrid Vlsekriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) method in conjunction with glowworm swarm optimization (GSO) strategies based on the energy, trust value, bandwidth, and memory to address this security-enabled, cluster-based data aggregation in the IoT. Next, we aggregate the data after the cluster has been built using a genetic algorithm (GA). After aggregation, the data are encrypted and delivered securely using the TIGSO-EDS architecture. Cuckoo search is used to analyze the data and choose the best route for sending them. The proposed model’s analysis of the results is analyzed, and its uniqueness has been demonstrated via comparison with existing models. TIGSO-EDS reduces energy consumption each round by 12.71–19.96% and increases the percentage of successfully delivered data packets from 2.50% to 5.66%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".