MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313889339 · doi:10.3390/tropicalmed8010049

Post-Artesunate Delayed Hemolysis: A Review of Current Evidence

2023· review· en· W4313889339 on OpenAlexaff
Sawettachai Jaita, Krit Madsalae, Sakarn Charoensakulchai, Borimas Hanboonkunapakarn, Kesinee Chotivanit, Anne McCarthy, Wasin Matsee

Bibliographic record

VenueTropical Medicine and Infectious Disease · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMalaria Research and Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersFaculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol UniversityMahidol University
KeywordsArtesunateHemolysisMedicineMalariaAdverse effectHemolytic anemiaAnemiaImmunologyPharmacologyInternal medicinePlasmodium falciparum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Artesunate is the drug of choice for treating patients with severe malaria. Post-artesunate delayed hemolysis (PADH) is an uncommon adverse event from malaria treatment. Most patients with PADH are non-immune travelers. The pathophysiology of PADH is not fully understood, but the most likely mechanism is "pitting", in which red blood cells carrying dead parasites killed by artesunate's action are directed to the spleen for clearing the dead parasites. After the cleansing process, these red blood cells re-enter the circulation but with a smaller size and impaired integrity, resulting in a shortened lifespan of 7-21 days. Therefore, most patients with PADH usually present with clinical features of hemolytic anemia 7 days or later after the initiation of artesunate. To date, the benefits of artesunate treatment outweigh its adverse events, and no fatal cases have resulted from PADH. However, the hematological follow-up of patients with malaria treated with artesunate is recommended for clinicians to detect any delayed hemolytic event early and prevent potentially serious consequences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.598
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTropical Medicine and Infectious DiseaseSame topicMalaria Research and ControlFrench-language works237,207