Adaptation process and occupational performance of mothers of children with autism spectrum disorders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction Adapting to a child with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) can impact the occupational performance of mothers because of the care they demand, which can lead to difficulties in carrying out their occupations. Objective To investigate the occupational performance and adaptation of mothers to their children with ASD. Method Cross-sectional, descriptive, quantitative and qualitative study conducted with 11 mothers of children with ASD aged 2-9 years. Data were collected using the Parental Disability Adaptation Scale (EPAD) and the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). EPAD data were analyzed by adding the scores of each participant and calculating the general average, whereas COPM data were analyzed from the values assigned to performance and satisfaction. Results The mothers were well adapted to their children; however, they evaluated the presence of functional problems for occupational performance after their birth. Functional problems in the productivity category, specifically in work performance due to the demands of caring for the children, were mentioned by most mothers. In the self-care category, some mothers reported problems related to going to the salon and taking a shower. In the leisure category, some mothers indicated problems with reading, physical activity, traveling and/or visiting friends. Conclusion The mothers in this study reported that adapting to their children with ASD involves factors such as transmission of the diagnosis, information, children characteristics, socioeconomic conditions, resilience, and personal beliefs and expectations. In conclusion, the mothers of children with ASD investigated presented functional problems regarding their occupational performance after the birth of these children.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".