MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313894372 · doi:10.34298/ic2271011k

ON THE QUESTION OF THE BYZANTINE RULE IN CROATIA IN THE LATE 10TH AND EARLY 11TH CENTURY

2022· article· en· W4313894372 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Предраг Коматина

Bibliographic record

VenueИсторијски часопис · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicByzantine Studies and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersScience Fund of the Republic of Serbia
KeywordsByzantine architectureContext (archaeology)Quarter (Canadian coin)Ancient historyPeninsulaCroatianHistoryPosition (finance)ClassicsArchaeologyPhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper addresses the relationship between the Byzantine emperors and Croatia and its position in the context of the Byzantine re-occupation of the Balkan Peninsula on two occasions: in the late 10th (971) and early 11th century (1018). It also discusses the Byzantine court dignities of the Croatian rulers Držislav and Krešimir and suggests the possibility that direct imperial rule existed in Croatia in the second quarter of the 11th century

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score0.475

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueИсторијски часописSame topicByzantine Studies and HistoryFrench-language works237,207