Satellite-derived bathymetry online - Validation study, upscaling SDB, SDB potential
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Satellite-Derived Bathymetry (SDB) methods have found their way into the hydrographers’ toolbox and are part of integrated survey concepts, nautical charts and support global and European programs such as Seabed2030 or EMODnet Bathymetry. The concept of the ‘physics-based’ SDB describes the calculation of bathymetry by modelling the sunlight path from the sun to the seafloor to the satellite sensor. It is a highly sophisticated model which enables the calculation of shallow water depth in the absence of any other survey or ground-truth data. Thus, bathymetric data can also be retrieved for remote and inaccessible areas - in contrast to empirical SDB approaches. Key questions which arise for SDB results are vertical accuracy, potential and feasibility for different sites and the methods to upscale SDB solutions. These questions are addressed in the current European innovation project 4S. Within the project SDB-Online was developed, a fully physics-based SDB concept which is installed in a cloud and accessible via a web user interface. The backend is parallelised and can be accessed via application programming interface (API) which allows a fully scalable and automatic SDB processing. In this study SDB-Online results are validated at ten sites, ranging from the higher latitudes of Canada to turbid UK waters to the Caribbean. Furthermore, a relationship between the Secchi Disc Depth and the cutoff depth of the SDB results is established and a global map of water-clarity potential of the SDB solution is presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".