DETERMINAN PARTISIPASI PROGRAM KAMPUNG KB PADA WANITA USIA SUBUR DI KABUPATEN BANYUMAS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Program kampung Keluarga Berkualitas (KB) merupakan program pemerintah yang dilaksanakan dalam upaya pencapaian Program Kependudukan, Keluarga Berencana, dan Pembangunan Keluarga. Pelaksanaan kampung KB di Kabupaten Banyumas telah diinisiasi di wilayah Desa Sumbang dan Kelurahan Karangpucung. Kegiatan kampung KB salah satunya adalah pelibatan khalayak sasaran yaitu Wanita Usia Subur (WUS). Tujuan penelitian ini yaitu mengidentifikasi faktor yang berpengaruh terhadap partisipasi program kampung KB. Populasi dalam penelitian ini yaitu Wanita Usia Subur di Kabupaten Banyumas. Sampel yang diambil dalam penelitian ini sebanyak 71 orang. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui wawancara dengan menggunakan kuesioner. Analisis data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan uji regresi logistik. Hasil penelitian dapat dijelaskan bahwa ada pengaruh antara sikap pelaksanaan kampung KB, dukungan suami dan akses kegiatan kampung KB terhadap partisipasi program kampung KB, serta tidak ada pengaruh antara pengetahuan tentang kampung KB. Simpulan dalam penelitian ini yaitu faktor yang paling berpengaruh dalam penelitian ini yaitu sikap pelaksanaan kampung KB. Rekomendasi penelitian ini yaitu pentingnya pendekatan program dalam faktor terkait dalam upaya peningkatan partisipasi program kampung KB.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".