MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313913042 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.02300

Locality Galois groups of meromorphic germs in several variables

2023· preprint· en· W4313913042 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Li Guo, Sylvie Paycha, Bin Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPolynomial and algebraic computation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsLocalityMeromorphic functionMathematicsGalois groupPure mathematicsGroup (periodic table)Algebra over a fieldPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Meromorphic germs in several variables with linear poles naturally arise in mathematics in various disguises. We investigate their rich structures under the prism of locality, including locality subalgebras, locality transformation groups and locality characters. The key technical tool is the dependence subspace for a meromorphic germ with which we define a locality orthogonal relation between two meromorphic germs. We describe the structure of locality subalgebras generated by classes of meromorphic germs with certain types of poles. We also define and determine their group of locality transformations which fix the holomorphic germs and preserve multivariable residues, a group we call the locality Galois group. We then specialise to two classes of meromorphic germs with prescribed types of nested poles, arising from multiple zeta functions in number theory and Feynman integrals in perturbative quantum field theory respectively. We show that they are locality polynomial subalgebras with locality polynomial bases given by the locality counterpart of Lyndon words. This enables us to explicitly describe their locality Galois group. As an application, we propose a mathematical interpretation of Speer's analytic renormalisation for Feynman amplitudes. We study a class of locality characters, called generalised evaluators after Speer. We show that the locality Galois group acts transitively on generalised evaluators by composition, thus providing a candidate for a renormalisation group in this multivariable approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.111 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicPolynomial and algebraic computationFrench-language works237,207