Bibliographic record
Abstract
<strong>This is an accepted article with a DOI pre-assigned that is not yet published.</strong> L'exploitation de l'anecdote dramatique en dehors des champs disciplinaires de la littérature et de l'histoire théâtrale est une première. Le présent article se propose de confronter les méthodologies de recherche en sciences humaines sur un objet d'étude récent, le récit anecdotique, au protocole expérimenté en physique sociale, afin d'apprécier la pertinence de l'usage de cette source, aux différentes étapes du travail d'exploitation. Il en résulte que le récit anecdotique est une source efficace pour modéliser des échanges sociaux entre plusieurs personnages, les spectateurs, en l'occurrence, d'un théâtre virtuel. De même cette expérience ouvre-t-elle la voie à de nouvelles pistes de réflexion pour les chercheurs en sciences humaines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".