Bibliographic record
Abstract
Giovanni da Verrazzano was a navigator of Tuscan origin, said to be born either in 1491 (or less likely in 1485), who, between 7 March 1524 (sighting of Cape Fear, North Carolina) and early July 1524 (arrival in Dieppe), led his ship Dauphine in the earliest known European exploration of the Eastern coasts of what are now the United States and Canada, from the Carolinas in the south to Nova Scotia and possibly Newfoundland in the North. In his short, dry, and apparently reliable report to the king of France Francis I (dated from Dieppe on 8 July 1524), he described the local flora and fauna, together with the Indigenous peoples he met. The main purpose of his 1524 crossing and of the expeditions that preceded and followed it was the finding of a Northwest Passage to Cathay (East Indies). The French Crown granted its patronage to the 1524 expedition, which was financially backed by investors in Florence and France (Rouen, Lyons), most of them of Tuscan origin. However, since the continental passage was not found and the surveyed coastline did not reveal any economic potential that could be compared to the Spanish riches in the south, Verrazzano’s 1524 expedition did not yield any follow-up and the eastern coastline north of Florida did not attract any new attempt at discovery until the early 17th century. Most of Verrazzano’s life is still shrouded in mystery. The date and place of his birth are unknown, nothing is known of his early years, and his possible participation in a 1508 voyage to the Gulf of St. Lawrence is not documented. He was probably active in Mediterranean trade, but the time of his joining the Florentine circles of relatives and friends in France before 1521 is again mostly conjectural. Lastly, there exists no other documentation of his 1524 crossing except his own report. After the 1524 expedition he was involved in an expedition to Brazil (1526–1527) and in another to Florida and the Lesser Antilles (1528), where he is said to have met with violent death.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.035 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".